Divorce is never easy. Even when both parties agree to the divorce, emotions often run high during the divorce process. These emotions can make reaching a marital agreement difficult. When a couple cannot reach an agreement, the divorce must go in front of a judge. This is less than desirable because litigation often costs time and money. In the end, you will not be able to make decisions about your future. The judge will make the final decision about your marriage and divorce. To avoid this, couples should consider a collaborative divorce. However, there are pros and cons of collaborative divorce in Florida. As such, it is essential to understand the collaborative divorce process before determining if it is right for you.
Tag: West Palm Beach Collaborative Divorce Attorney
Is Collaborative Divorce in Florida Right for You?
Collaborative divorce in Florida has been around for a long time. However, in recent years, this type of divorce has gained popularity thanks to a new law.
In 2017, the Florida Supreme Court approved the Collaborative Law Process Act. This created an alternative to traditional litigation for divorcing couples in Florida. This act presents divorcing couples with guidelines. These guidelines help couples resolve differences in a kinder and more amicable way.
When considering divorce, it is important to understand your legal options. If you and your spouse are both in agreement, a collaborative divorce may offer you better solutions.
When a Collaborative Divorce Lawyer Is the Right Choice
Collaborative divorce is one of the newest – and easiest – ways to handle a divorce. In a collaborative divorce, instead of two parties fighting over every minute of parenting time and household item, the couple deliberately sets the tone by hiring attorneys certified in collaborative divorce.
The Process of Collaborative Divorce
In a collaborative divorce, both parties initially sign a participation agreement. This agreement outlines the commitment of both parties and their attorneys to reach a settlement without judicial intervention.